The classical way
Software grew into a process: vision, architecture, specifications, a manager, a planning methodology, layers of teams, long release intervals, and feedback that flows back through a completely different channel.
- Vision → architect → specifications → product manager
- Waterfall, then Scrum and Agile: methodologies that all assume the biggest deficiency is execution capacity
- Layers of teams: developers, UI/UX, testers, backend, DevOps
- Long, predictable release intervals
- Feedback flows back through customer success and help desks, whose job is to explain how the client can fit the software
- In the best case, a little percolates back to the product manager, and the loop starts again
- The whole process lasts an extremely long time
The Betamaxx way
We went back to first principles: you have an application in mind that makes somebody's work lighter or enables something new. Get to a manifestation of it as fast as possible.
- You are the Product Officer: dictate what you intend to make, it doesn't even have to be super specific
- Agents help you create a good specification; AI drafts the plan and the specifications
- Invite any stakeholder you need to make the plan better
- The Agentic Software Factory elaborates the plan, finds the architecture, the methodologies, the development operations
- It creates the software, tests it, security-checks it, deploys it and verifies it in production, through the front end
- It integrates the Betamax widget, so you can onboard users as soon as you have a basic product
- Users' remarks land in the same place where you started, triaged against your codebase, your documentation, your vision
- You decide: send it to the factory. Turnaround: hours, sometimes minutes. Users are notified at every step
